Discussion:
jms with MQe and triggerTransmission
(too old to reply)
Wolfgang Röckelein
2005-11-22 13:53:10 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

I want to access MQe through JMS. How do I call triggerTransmission or
what is the JMS equivalent?

Thanks,
Wolfgang
vijay
2005-11-23 05:35:05 UTC
Permalink
Hi,
Connection.start() will be appropriate.But no where we could compare it
with triggerTransmission.
regards,
Vijay
Post by Wolfgang Röckelein
Hi,
I want to access MQe through JMS. How do I call triggerTransmission or
what is the JMS equivalent?
Thanks,
Wolfgang
Arun
2006-01-25 21:23:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by vijay
Hi,
Connection.start() will be appropriate.But no where we could compare it
with triggerTransmission.
regards,
Vijay
Post by Wolfgang Röckelein
Hi,
I want to access MQe through JMS. How do I call triggerTransmission or
what is the JMS equivalent?
Thanks,
Wolfgang
Hi,

The main idea of using JMS is to become independent of vendor (in
this case MQe). JMS hides the platform or vendor specific API and give
us a common API across all MOM vendors. Trigger transmission is a way
to push the pending messages in WMQe, and its not a generic function to
be exposed in JMS.

By writing/calling WMQe specific api in JMS apps would ruin idea
of vendor independent API.

Regards
Arun
Wolfgang Röckelein
2006-02-07 14:05:41 UTC
Permalink
By writing/calling WMQe specific api in JMS apps would ruin idea of
vendor independent API.
Unfortunatly, messages do not get sent out reliable with the JMS api in
a changing offline/online scenario. Unfortunatly I was forced therefore
to dump the MQe JMS API and use the MQe API directly...

Wolfgang

Loading...